![]() ![]() ![]() International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62, 1720–1741. Assessing the macro-level correlates of malware infections using a routine activities framework. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29, 420–436. Examining the relationship between routine activities and malware infection indicators. Examining the applicability of lifestyle–routine activities theory for cybercrime victimization. Subcultural evolution? Examining the influence of on- and off-line experiences on deviant subcultures. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company. Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. ![]() Identity theft complaints: Exploring the state-level correlates. Peer interventions in playground bullying. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29. Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Virtual criminology: Old wine in new bottles? Social and Legal Studies, 10, 243–249. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1296–1315. Assessing the effect of routine activity theory and self-control on property, personal, and sexual assault victimization. What distinguishes single from recurrent sexual victims? The role of lifestyle-routine activities and first-incident characteristics. Criminology & Public Policy, 1, 257–308.įisher, B. Being pursued: Stalking victimization in a national study of college women. Crime in the ivory tower: Level and sources of student victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 468–483.įisher, B. A survey of online harassment at a university campus. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.įelson, M. ![]() Classifying common police problems: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 46, 505–524.Įck, J. Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 90–118.Ĭohen, L. Property crime rates in the United States: A macrodynamic analysis, 1947–1977 with ex ante forecasts for the mid-1980s. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.Ĭohen, L. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. Hot products: Understanding, anticipating and reducing demand for stolen goods. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2, 308–333.Ĭlarke, R. Computer crime victimization and integrated theory: An empirical assessment. Demographic characteristics and victimization risk: Testing the mediating effects of routine activities. Computer simulation as a tool for environmental criminologists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3–28.īrantingham, P. Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Predicting online harassment victimization among a juvenile population. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3, 400–420.īossler, A. On-line activities, guardianship, and malware infection: An examination of routine activities theory. Children’s experiences of cyberbullying: A Canadian national study. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.īeran, T., Mishna, F., McInroy, L. Stalking victimization in the United States. Keywordsīaum, K., Catalano, S., Rand, M., & Rose, K. Though results have been mixed, there appears to be a fair amount of evidence indicating the potential for the adaptation of these theories to explain and predict cybercrime. While the applicability of these types of theories to the nonphysical world of the Internet has received a fair amount of debate, almost all major forms of cybercrime have been studied via a routine activities’ framework. To that end, one of the most popular categories of criminological theory – routine activity theories – has been utilized as a primary means of analyzing online victimization. In an effort to explain cybercrime, researchers have begun adapting and examining criminology theories in this new virtual context. As a result of the development of technology and the Internet, traditional crimes have begun to evolve, while new forms of crime have also been born. Nowhere has this been more evident than with the progression of crime and victimization. The growth of technology, and specifically the Internet, has had a profound effect on what was considered routine behavior and actions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |